Showing posts with label Sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sex. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

HIV = AIDS, Fact or Fraud?

Too many people are making too much money out of it, and money is much stronger than truth. One of the most powerful video documentaries of our time boldly reveals the modern medical-industrial complex’s dire descent into utter corruption. This feature-length expose explains exactly how the 300-Billion-dollar AID$ fraud began, why HIV can NOT be the cause of AIDS, what the real causes could be, and who manipulates the public’s good intentions while poisoning hundreds of thousands with toxic drugs that cause the very disease they are supposed to prevent.

This is a systematic dissection of the HIV/AID$ machine and how they hijacked a program designed to fight a worldwide plight of human suffering and drove it down the road to hell. Yet this program offers hope, inspired by the courage and articulate arguments of a group of growing voices internationally challenging the HIV=AIDS=DEATH hysteria. A MUST SEE for anyone interested in truly understanding the facts about HIV/AID$.

You will meet a number of highly reputable scientists who all agree that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, including Dr. Peter Duesberg, who was the first scientist to map the genetic structure of retroviruses. He is joined by Nobel Prize winners Dr. Kary Mullis and Dr.Walter Gilbert, along with Dr. David Rasnick, an expert in the field of protease inhibitors.

Is HIV/AIDS the golden idol of junk science? Judge for yourself. Professionally produced, written and researched, acclaimed by physicians, scientists, journalists and humanitarians internationally, this is the video encyclopedia of HIV/AIDS dissident movement! THE defining documentary on the HIV/AIDS fraud.
Source

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Monday, July 12, 2010

Nature's weirdest sex lives

ONCE upon a time, sex in the animal kingdom seemed pretty simple. Flamboyant male met coy female, male courted female, male deposited spermatozoa in the vicinity of an ovary, then headed out to do it all again elsewhere.

Then biologists began to look more closely, at what really happens. They found that being the biggest and brashest male doesn't always win you mating rights. Among weaver fish, for example, it is good fathers, the ones who will take care of the fry, who get the girl. Females don't always conform to type either. The female bean weevil, for instance, would rather drink her mate's ejaculate than use it to fertilise her eggs. Reproduction, it turns out, is a complex affair.

Just how complex has been emphasised anew with a slew of studies that highlight the staggering diversity of sexual practice in the animal kingdom. Intercourse is a bizarre and often dangerous pursuit, where sexually transmitted infections can be desirable, living in a male harem inside your mate can make sense, and headless lovers give you extra. Relations between the sexes are also surprisingly convoluted. Biologists have charted virgin births, spontaneous sex changes and, perhaps weirdest of all, males who father their brother's offspring. Human sexual exuberance is tame compared with some of the things that animals get up to in the name of reproduction.
 
Preying mantis
Take the male preying mantis, the poster boy of risky sex. In an ideal world, he will jump onto a female's back, establish a rigid grip, copulate and jump away again, safe to repeat the process with some other female. Much of the time, however, that grip will slip. If it does, the male slides within reach of the female's mandibles and he stands a very good chance of having his head bitten off.

Being eaten by your partner during copulation is clearly not desirable. William Brown at the State University of New York at Fredonia thinks the males tread a delicate line. His research reveals that they approach females with trepidation: the drive to reproduce and the drive to survive are at loggerheads (The American Naturalist, vol 167, p 263). "Our work suggests that males actively assess the level of risk posed by an individual female and alter their behaviour to reduce the risk of sexual cannibalism," Brown says. "We expect that the level of acceptable risk to the male will depend upon features such as the availability of safer mating opportunities, the age of the male - and thus his expectation of future reproduction - and perhaps even the quality of the female."

From the female's point of view, cannibalistic sex looks like a winner on several fronts. Clearly, it provides a nutritious meal, making it particularly popular among females who have not eaten for a while. But there may also be another benefit. In some mantid species, losing your head means that you have also lost the system of nerves that tells you to stop copulating. Meanwhile, the nerves that keep copulation going, which are in your abdomen, remain intact. So following decapitation, the female gets everything the male has to offer, as it were. There's just one downside. "Hungrier, more cannibalistic females attract fewer males," Brown says.
  
Another species in which females keep males firmly in their place is the green spoonworm, Bonellia viridis. Found in the warm waters of the Mediterranean Sea, B. viridis begins life as free-floating flake-like larvae. When they settle on the sea floor, they mature over a period of years into 10-centimetre-long females. Many, however, do not make it this far. If a larva should settle on top of a female instead, she produces a chemical called bonellin that turns the larva into a tiny male. This male then creeps up her body and into her mouth, from where it migrates down to her uterus. "Once inside the female, males assume a parasitic existence: they depend on the female for their nourishment," says Patrick Schembri of the University of Malta. But there is mutual benefit. With up to 20 males safely holed up inside her genital sac, the female can get her eggs fertilised without expending any effort on finding a mate.

With 20 males inside her genital sac, the female green spoonworm can get her eggs fertilised without any effort While B. viridis females keep their males captive, aphids prefer a more detached relationship. In fact, many species only copulate once a year and it's not even sperm the females are after.
 
 The female green spoonworm keeps the male in its place (Image: 
Biosphoto/Dino Simeonidis/Still Pictures)
The female green spoonworm keeps the male in its place 
(Image: Biosphoto/Dino Simeonidis/Still Pictures)

A female aphid can reproduce without sex. In terms of her genetic legacy, it makes perfect sense to do this because she can produce many clones that carry all her genes down through the generations. So why do aphids make time for an annual bout of sex? This question puzzled Nancy Moran and Helen Dunbar at the University of Tucson in Arizona. Their surprising discovery is that aphids have sex to acquire sexually transmitted infections (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 103, p 12803).
 

Infectious sex

Like you and me, aphids carry bacteria on and in their bodies, many of which are useful. Some break down plants the insect would not be able to digest unaided. Others confer resistance to extremes of temperature. One particularly valuable bacterium, Hamiltonella defensa, kills the grubs of parasitic wasps before they start growing within the aphid's body cavity and consume it from the inside. A female aphid can acquire such useful bacteria by having sex with an infected male, and she can also pass them to her future clones. "Once they are established in the clonal descendants of the sexual female, they can be quite stable and confer longer term resistance," Moran says. So her female offspring will continue favouring asexual reproduction while the males wait on the sidelines for a chance to exchange bacteria for sex.
 
  Aphids
Aphids not withstanding, sex is an extremely popular means of procreation in the animal kingdom. Its ubiquity is still something of a mystery but it must offer benefits that outweigh the advantage of being able to produce numerous exact copies of oneself by cloning. One possibility is that by shuffling your genes and throwing your lot in with another individual, you can produce healthier offspring that do not inherit the damaging mutations that inevitably build up in an isolated genome. Another is that sexual reproduction gives rise to offspring with novel genetic combinations that increase the chances that some will survive when faced with environmental change or disease. But wouldn't it be more useful if, like the aphids, an individual could hedge its bets, switching between sexual and asexual reproduction and getting the benefit of both?
 
Alas, for most higher animals that is not possible. However, there are some exceptions where cloning occurs via a process called parthenogenesis, where the egg fuses with a by-product of egg production - known as a sister polar body - rather than a sperm cell. This rare form of asexual reproduction has occasionally been observed in lizards and birds: female turkeys isolated from males for a very long time, for instance, sometimes produce young by parthenogenesis. But it seems to come at a price. Mortality rates are high and developmental problems abound.
 
Which makes a recent report from researchers at the Field Museum in Chicago all the more intriguing. Earlier this year, Kevin Feldheim and colleagues published the results of a genetic analysis of two white-spotted bamboo sharks born in captivity to a mother who had never shared her tank with a male (Journal of Heredity, vol 101, p 374). The test confirmed that they are clones and that their mother had not experienced a close encounter of the sperm kind. There have been a few reports of virgin births in sharks before now, but none has been known to produce offspring that survived long term. The bamboo sharks are now five years old and healthy, suggesting that parthenogenesis is not an evolutionary dead end after all.
 
Mushroom coral
Animals that can adapt their sexual strategy to suit their situation are clearly at an advantage. The ability to occasionally do without sperm if there are no males available may be what has allowed sharks to stick around for hundreds of millions of years, making them one of the most ancient animal lineages on Earth. Some creatures have an even more impressive trick, though - when the going gets tough they have a sex change.
 
Bees do it, some fish do too, but the latest creature to join the list of transsexuals is the mushroom coral. By switching from female to male, it can survive environmental stresses such as temperature rises that cause other species of coral to become bleached and die. "The whole idea is to save energy," says Yossi Loya of Tel Aviv University in Israel, who first spotted this behaviour in 2008 (Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol 275, p 2335). The reason is simple - producing eggs costs more energy than producing sperm. So a male-dominated colony is more energetically frugal, increasing its chances of toughing out the hard times. Then, when conditions improve, Loya has shown, some individuals flip between sexes, choosing the one that will give them the best chance of reproducing, depending on what their nearest neighbours are doing.
 

Ultimate male shirker

The mushroom coral's pragmatic attitude to gender highlights the point that being male is often an easier option than being female. The ultimate male shirker, however, has to be the fire ant - but it pays a price. While the queen and her daughters work tirelessly to keep the colony going, "males are only spermatozoid with wings: they do nothing", says Denis Fournier of the Free University of Brussels (ULB) in Belgium. Even their occasional contributions of sperm ultimately come to naught, since the eggs they fertilise all develop into the sterile female workers. Meanwhile, the queen produces new queens by cloning. In this way, males are cut out of the evolutionary line.
 
In fact, additional males are only produced when the queen lays eggs that do not contain any of her genetic material and a male fertilises them. This odd situation has led David Queller of Rice University in Houston, Texas, to suggest that the males can be considered a separate species to the females (Nature, vol 435, p 1167).
 
If your sole contribution to reproduction is a single, tiny sperm, you are always in danger of becoming expendable, so it makes sense for males to add value. A good ploy is to help raise the kids, but if males are not to waste time and energy caring for someone else's offspring they need to be able to recognise their own. That can be far from simple, as the very strange tale of the marmoset illustrates.
 
  Marmosets
These small South American monkeys are among the most attentive of fathers. Marmosets are born as fraternal twins, developing from two distinct eggs, but they have more in common than your average siblings. From early in gestation they share a placenta, causing their blood to intermingle. As a result, most are born containing cells from their twin, making them chimeras. This has been known for half a century, but it has now become apparent that there is a link between marmoset chimerism and doting dadhood.
 
In 2007, Jeffrey French and colleagues from the University of Nebraska in Omaha reported that over half of all male marmosets have chimeric sperm, meaning that they are in the bizarre position of being able to father their brother's or sister's offspring. Some females also have chimeric eggs, meaning they may effectively be surrogate mothers for their twin. In addition, many marmosets also have chimeric skin and so produce odours characteristic of both their own genetic make-up and that of their twin. Marmosets recognise each other by these smells, and the researchers found that fathers and uncles are more than twice as likely to look after young with chimeric skin. Mothers and aunts, in contrast, pay less attention to offspring with chimeric skin than to those without.
 
Over half of all male marmosets have chimeric sperm, meaning that they are able to father their twin's offspring
The implications are mind-boggling. Clearly the marmosets' genes are all mixed up - to such an extent that even the researchers are left scratching their heads over whether these little monkeys should even be considered as separate individuals. Still, in a world where a chimeric male can father chimeric twins with his brother's sperm, surely human relationships will never look quite so complicated again.
 

How to survive celibacy

Animals have some very strange sexual habits, but perhaps nothing is quite as puzzling as the bdelloid rotifer, which has survived for 80 million years with no sex at all. This ancient line of cloners was seen by the late John Maynard Smith as an "evolutionary scandal". According to standard evolutionary theory they should have become extinct long ago. Without the gene shuffling and novel genetic combinations that sex brings, parasites or changing environments ought to have done them in by now. However, it is now becoming clear how bdelloid rotifers have kept their virginity for so long.
 
Rotifers
In 2008, researchers from Harvard University and Woods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory, both in Massachusetts, found one trick the rotifers use when they discovered that the creature's genome is chock-full of genes from bacteria, fungi and plants. While bdelloid rotifers may not be swapping genes among themselves, over the millennia they have clearly had a healthy trade via horizontal gene transfer with other organisms. This, the team suggests, could be a satisfactory alternative to sex, giving a limited means of shuffling genes (Science, vol 320, p 1210).

Then, earlier this year, a team led by Chris Wilson of Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, found that the canny rotifers have another strategy that might make sex redundant. Rather than fighting their parasites by evolving, they evade them by allowing themselves to desiccate and be blown away on the wind. When they reach another location, they rehydrate and get back on with the business of not having sex (Science, vol 327, p 574).
"If parasites are indeed the problem that sex evolved to address, then bdelloids may have a unique alternative way of solving it," says Wilson.
SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Out in the Silence

Love, hate and a quest for change in small town America.
Watch more free documentaries
Following the story of a small American town confronting a firestorm of controversy ignited by a same-sex wedding announcement in the local newspaper, this gripping documentary illustrates the challenges of being an outsider in a conservative rural community and the change that is possible when courageous people break the silence and search for common ground.
SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails
Bookmark and Share

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Even in Old Age, Men Want Sex More Than Women Do

Spring is coming, and a young man's thoughts turn to ... you know. Apparently, old men's thoughts turn to the same subject. According to an article to be published Wednesday in the British Medical Journal, 67% of men ages 65 to 74 said they had been sexually active in the past year, compared with just 40% of women in that age group. Everyone knows young men think constantly about sex, but many guys remain interested in sex until they are almost dead: more than one-third of men ages 75 to 85 said they had sex in the past 12 months, compared with just 17% of women in that age group.
Some of this surely has to do with Viagra, which makes it easier for older men to be interested in sex. But the disparity in sexual activity between older men and older women isn't entirely explained by the 1998 release of the little blue pill. One set of data presented in the new paper — taken from the National Survey of Midlife Development, involving about 3,000 adults ages 25 to 74 — was collected in 1995 and 1996. That data set shows that 62% of men ages 65 to 74 reported sexual activity in the previous six months; only 36% of women in the same age group did so. (See pictures of couples married for 50 years or more.)
These differences matter because having a healthy sex life is strongly associated with having a healthy life, period — and also a longer life. Scientists aren't sure about the causal relationship here. Sexually active people tend to be healthier, and healthier people tend to be sexually active. It could be that the fulfillment of sex gives you a health boost, or that being more fit makes sex better — or, more likely, it's a little of both.
What we do know, from this new paper, is that if you are a 30-year-old male, you can be expected to have sex for 35 more years. The authors — Dr. Stacy Tessler Lindau and researcher Natalia Gavrilova of the University of Chicago — call this measure your "sexually active life expectancy," or SALE. A 30-year-old woman has a SALE of just 31 more years. (The study also finds that men and women who stay healthy and in good shape gain extra years of sexually active life in older age, compared with their peers in poorer health.) But women live about five years longer than men, so when you do the math, all this means that women go approximately twice as long without sex as men before they die. (See TIME's sex covers.)
Older women also enjoy the sex they do have far less than older men. Married women ages 57 to 64 who haven't been divorced or widowed report having about as much sex as married men in the same age group. But while 77% of partnered men in that age group say they are interested in sex, only 36% of partnered women report the same interest. These figures suggest that a lot of older women may be having sex when they don't really want to. (Comment on this story.)
Lindau, the lead author on the paper, is cautious about drawing strong conclusions from this variance. "It may be that women are more likely to have sex for reasons other than fulfilling pleasure — or that they are more interested in giving a partner satisfaction," she says. "Maybe they lack the agency, or maybe they feel marital duty, but our paper doesn't provide an explanation." (See how to prevent illness at any age.)
It's a shortcoming in the paper that the journal itself notes: in a British Medical Journal editorial accompanying the paper, Texas A&M University professor Patricia Goodson says that while Lindau and Gavrilova's new SALE measure might someday prove a useful tool for gauging an aging population's medical and public-health needs as they relate to sex, it "sheds no light on the intriguing — and still poorly understood — question of why, even though they enjoy fewer years of sexually active life, many women do not perceive this as a 'problem.' " (See pictures of longevity around the world.)
Another problem the editorial doesn't mention: the paper is based on self-reported data, and although the authors note that self-reported information about health is usually highly consistent with objective health data, reports of actual sexual activity simply cannot be objectively measured. Even so, the paper does confirm a large difference in sexual interest among older men and older women.
The reasons for the male-female sex disparity among the elderly may not be clear, but the paper shows that the problem in sex quality seems to worsen with age. Still, there is a silver lining for older women having bad or unwanted sex: men tend to die younger than women. Also, it is men's increasing physical and health problems that are most commonly cited (by both men and women) as the reason sexual activity declines later in life. (See a story about elder porn in Japan.)
The new paper raises more questions than it answers. When interviewed, Lindau avoids making any sweeping social commentary. Instead, she notes that as a gynecologist, she gets a lot of questions from older patients about whether their level of sexual activity is normal. "And I haven't had the data to give these women answers," she says. The new paper is a start.
Source
Related Posts with Thumbnails
Bookmark and Share
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Statistic


View My Stats