Friday, August 20, 2010

Magnetic mega-star discovery challenges black hole theory

A neutron star with a mighty magnetic field has thrown down the gauntlet
to theories about stellar evolution and the birth of black holes,
astronomers said today.

A neutron star with a mighty magnetic field has thrown down the gauntlet to theories about stellar evolution and the birth of black holes, astronomers said today.

This artist's impression of a magnetar contains hundreds of very massive stars, some shining with a brilliance of almost one million suns Photo: ESO
 
The "magnetar" lies in a cluster of stars known as Westerlund 1, located 16,000 light years away in the constellation of Ara, the Altar.
Westerlund 1, discovered in 1961 by a Swedish astronomer, is a favoured observation site in stellar physics. It is one of the biggest cluster of superstars in the Milky Way, comprising hundreds of very massive stars, some shining with a brilliance of almost a million Suns and some two thousand times the Sun's diameter.

The cluster is also, by the standards of the Universe, very young.
The stars were all born from a single event just three and a half to five million years ago.
Within Westerlund 1 is the remains of one of galaxy's few magnetars - a particular kind of neutron star, formed from the explosion of a supernova, that can exert a magnetic field a million, billion times strong than Earth's.

The Westerlund star which eventually became the magnetar must have been at least 40 times the mass of the Sun, according to the study, which appears in the research journal Astronomy and Astrophysics. If so, intriguing questions are raised.

The mainstream assumption is that stars of between 10 and 25 solar masses go on to form neutron stars. But those above 25 solar masses produce black holes -- the light-gobbling gravitational monsters that are formed when a massive, dying star collapses in on itself.
In that case, the magnetar's mother should have become a black hole because it was so big.
But another alternative, say the authors, is that the star "slimmed" to a lower mass, enabling it to become a neutron star.

How did this happen? The answer, says the paper, could lie in a binary system: the star that became the magnetar was born with a stellar companion.
As the stars evolved, they began to interact, and the companion star, like a demonic twin, began to steal mass from the progenitor star.

Eventually the progenitor exploded, becoming a supernova.
The binary connection was sundered by the blast and both stars were ejected from the cluster, leaving just glowing remnants which are the magnetar, according to this theory.
"If this is the case, it suggests that binary systems might play a key role in stellar evolution," said Simon Clark, who led the team, using the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Paranal, Chile, to make the observations.

A binary system could be "the ultimate cosmic 'diet plan' for heavyweight stars, which shifts over 95 per cent of their initial mass," he said.
SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails
Bookmark and Share

The universe 'will expand forever',
new Nasa study on 'dark energy' concludes

The universe will continue to expand forever, Nasa scientists concluded in a new study that sheds light on one of the greatest astronomical puzzles, “dark energy”.

The universe 'will expand forever', new Nasa study on 'dark energy' concludes

The massive gravitational force of the dark matter (shown in blue) in giant galaxy cluster Abell 1689 bends the light from distant background galaxies, giving astronomers clues to the nature of dark energy. Photo: NASA/ JPL

Space agency researchers used the Hubble Space Telescope to “narrow in” on what they believe comprises the energy, which pushes our universe apart at ever-increasing speed.
Discovered it in 1998, astronomers have been unable to say what the mysterious force is, except that it is invisible and makes up a “large chunk of our universe”, or 72 per cent of its size.

Almost a quarter, 24 per cent, is thought to be "dark matter", which is also mysterious but easier to study than dark energy because of its “gravitational influence”.
The rest of the universe, a mere four per cent, is made of “the stuff that makes up people, planets, stars and everything made up of atoms”.
By using the huge “galactic magnifying lens” the international team of scientists, led by Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, concluded the distribution of dark energy would mean the universe would never stop growing.

The study, published in the journal Science on Thursday, also found it would eventually become a dead and cold wasteland.
The scientists used Hubble and European Space Observatory's Very Large Telescope to observe how light from distant stars became distorted around a nearby cluster of galaxies called Abell 1689.
The galaxies, found in the constellation of Virgo, is one of the biggest galactic clusters known to science.
Due to its huge mass, scientists say it “acts as a cosmic magnifying glass”, causing light to bend around it.
"We have to tackle the dark energy problem from all sides," said Prof Eric Jullo, a JPL scientist who led the international study.

"It's important to have several methods, and now we've got a new, very powerful one.
"What I like about our new method is that it's very visual. You can literally see gravitation and dark energy bend the images of the background galaxies into arcs.”

He said the study’s conclusion meant scientists could say for the first time that the expansion of the universe “will continue to accelerate and the universe will expand forever”.
Priya Natarajan, a cosmologist at Yale University, who was part of the team, added: “We can now apply our technique to other gravitational lenses.
SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails
Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

UFOs Under Investigation

This new series takes a definitive, scientific look at the state of the search for UFOs as of the year 2003, documenting many UFO stories which have been debunked, and more importantly, bringing viewers up to date on the state of the most famous UFO investigations which still remain unresolved and unexplained to this day. According to some skeptics, American astronauts never really landed on the moon, even worse, they claim that a handful of initiated in close contact with extraterrestrials have infiltrated our governments. UFOs Under Investigation examines the foundation of this great cosmic conspiracy.

SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Through The Wormhole with Morgan Freeman:
How Did We Get Here


Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5
Everywhere we look, life exists in both the most hospitable of environments and in the most extreme. Yet we have only ever found life on our planet. How did the stuff of stars come together to create life as we know it? What do we really mean by ‘life’? And will unlocking this mystery help us find life elsewhere?

About 4.6 billion years ago, our solar system resembled a giant cloud of swirling cosmic dust, hydrogen and other gases. As with the thousands of other such clouds in our galaxy, some of these molecules began condensing, gathering and creating their own gravity.

Eventually these small clumps formed what became our sun — a star surrounded by a quickly moving, flat disc made up of the cloud’s leftovers. These leftovers also developed into our solar system’s planets, asteroid belt and other interstellar bodies.

Earth’s relative proximity to the sun meant that gases were largely burned away in those early days, leaving a rocky, metal-rich planet made from planetesimals, or smaller cosmic bodies. These same planetesimals also may have brought water and gases later. Often made of ice, they helped to plant the seeds for what would become a fertile, water-rich planet with a healthy atmosphere, capable of protecting life from the sun’s harmful rays.

SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Through The Wormhole with Morgan Freeman:
Beyond The Darkness

Part 1


Part 2


Part 3


Part 4


Part 5

Are we alone? Where did we come from? Is there life on other planets? From the latest work at NASA and private enterprise facilities to the latest theories from futurists and physicists, this series looks at black holes, colonizing the planets, string theory and more. Science Channel invites viewers on the journey as Morgan Freeman picks up where Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" left off and explores the new frontiers of what is beyond earth.

SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails

Bookmark and Share

Through The Wormhole with Morgan Freeman:
Before The Beginning

Part 1


Part 2


Part 3


Part 4


Part 5


Every cosmologist and astronomer agrees: our Universe is 13.7 billion years old. Using cutting-edge technology, scientists are now able to take a snapshot of the Universe a mere heartbeat after its birth. Armed with hypersensitive satellites, astronomers look back in time to the very moment of creation, when all the matter in the Universe exploded into existence. It is here that we uncover an unsolved mystery as old as time itself — if the Universe was born, where did it come from? Meet the leading scientists who have now discovered what they believe to be the origin of our Universe, and a window into the time before time.

SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails

Bookmark and Share

Through The Wormhole with Morgan Freeman:
Are We Alone

Part 1


Part 2


Part 3


Part 4


Part 5


Why haven't we yet met E.T.? It turns out we're only just developing instruments powerful enough to find them.

SourceRelated Posts with Thumbnails

Bookmark and Share
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Statistic


View My Stats